- By Kessy Clark
- Translated by Mohamed SAKHRI
Situated in Southeast Asia, East Timor, also known as Timor-Leste, emerged as a relatively new independent nation. Upon gaining independence in 2002, East Timor was one of the poorest countries globally, with a nominal GDP per capita of just US$366 (Kingsbury 2007, 364). Adverse socio-economic conditions combined with divisions among the Timorese political elite resulted in authoritarian tendencies within the government (Kingsbury 2007, 364). However, with support from the international community, East Timor rapidly began a democratization process, which included the establishment of a semi-presidential system, free elections, and democratic institutions. This raises the question: what factors influenced the democratization process in East Timor? Currently, does the country reflect a promising or precarious democratic future?
The Roots of Democracy in East Timor
Following years of Portuguese colonial rule and a grim period of Indonesian occupation, East Timor voted for independence in a referendum on August 30, 1999 (Beauman 2016, 2). In response to the alarming humanitarian, economic, and political crises facing the state, the United Nations established the United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) via Security Council Resolution 1272. UNTAET’s mission was not only to facilitate the transition to independence but also to develop political institutions aligned with the democratic ideals demanded by the international community (Beauman 2016, 6). This included electoral systems, the judiciary, the police, and more (Beauman 2016, 6). Furthermore, this administration played an active role in drafting the Timorese Constitution, providing a solid foundation for a democratic regime (Feijó 2016, 138). Following independence in 2002, the UN continued its missions that were crucial for East Timor’s democratization, such as UNMISET, UNOTIL, and UNMIT. These missions primarily focused on elections, administration, and security while strengthening democratic institutions within the country (UN 2006). Therefore, it is clear that the UN’s intervention significantly contributed to the consolidation of democracy and political stability in East Timor.
Is Democracy Sustainable?
Is this democracy, inherited from the UN, sustainable? The sustainability of democracy hinges on various factors, including political stability, citizen engagement, and the protection of human rights (Munck 2012, 11-14). The Timorese Constitution, adopted on March 22, 2002, established a presidential system that distributed executive power between the President and the Prime Minister. Although this political division initially led to democratic impasses post-independence, a rapprochement among political elites since 2013 has spurred democratic progress and political stability in East Timor (Leach 2016, 206). Today, the young nation continues to maintain a surprisingly sustainable democracy, evidenced by the recent presidential elections in 2022 and parliamentary elections in 2023, which occurred peacefully and transparently (ANFREL 2023). Since the country’s inception, citizen participation has averaged an impressive 78% (Bermeo 2022, 163). In this regard, East Timor stands out compared to several of its Asian neighbors and nearly matches voter turnout rates in wealthier democracies like Germany and Norway (Bermeo 2022, 163). In terms of human rights protection, the island nation is also emerging as a leading democracy in Southeast Asia. The World Freedom Index by Freedom House assesses access to political rights and civil liberties on a scale of 100. According to this index, Timor-Leste has a commendable score of 72, classifying it as a free nation (Freedom House 2023). In contrast, other Southeast Asian countries score significantly lower: Laos at 13, Vietnam at 19, Thailand at 30, and Singapore at 47 (Freedom House 2023).
Contemporary Challenges in East Timor
Nevertheless, despite its democratic achievements, East Timor remains the poorest country in Southeast Asia, struggling with limited access to essential resources such as food, clean water, and education (World Food Programme 2022). Its principal vulnerability stems from a lack of economic diversification, resulting in a heavy dependence on oil resources, which renders the nation susceptible “to fluctuations in global oil prices” and the depletion of these resources (UN 2019, 24).
Today, through successful elections and steadfast adherence to democratic principles, East Timor demonstrates itself as one of the most stable democracies in Southeast Asia. The democratic future of this young nation appears promising. However, challenges persist. The country must address the growing poverty of its citizens and diversify its national economy, which remains overly reliant on oil. If the Timorese government can tackle these concerns, could East Timor emerge as the leading model of democratization in Southeast Asia?
Bibliography
Asian Network for Free Elections. 2023. “2023 Timor Leste Parliamentary Elections: Celebrating Independence through Genuine Elections.” ANFREL International Election Observation Mission Report. https://anfrel.org/2023-timor-leste-parliamentary-elections-celebrating-independence-through-genuine-elections/
Beauman, Lydia. Political Institutions in East Timor: Semi-Presidentialism and Democratization. Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series, 79. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668772.
Bermeo, Nancy. 2022. “The Puzzle of Timor-Leste.” In Democracy in Hard Places. Edited by Scott Mainwaring and Tarek Masoud, 160-187. Oxford University Press.
Feijó, Rui Graça. Dynamics of Democracy in Timor-Leste: The Birth of a Democratic Nation, 1999-2012. Amsterdam University Press, 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1d8hb4r
Freedom House. 2023. Freedom in the World. https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores
Kingsbury, Damien. 2007. “Timor-Leste: The Harsh Reality After Independence.” Southeast Asian Affairs, 2007: 361-377. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/400112/pdf
Leach, Michael. Nation-Building and National Identity in Timor-Leste. London: Routledge, 2016.
Munck, Gerardo L. 2012. “The Origins and Durability of Democracy.” In Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics. Edited by Peter Kingstone and Deborah J. Yashar, 3-20. London: Routledge.
United Nations. 2006. “United Nations Mission of Support in East Timor.” United Nations. https://peacekeeping.un.org/mission/past/unmiset/background.html
United Nations. 2019. “Common Country Analysis: Timor-Leste.” Common Country Analysis. New York: United Nations. https://minio.uninfo.org/uninfo-production-main/ad5792a7-6ce7-43d6-b44a-85b04868bed9_Timor-Leste_CCA_2020.pdf
World Food Programme, Executive Board, October 3, 2022. “Timor-Leste Country Strategic Plan (2023-2025).” Country Strategic Plan. https://executiveboard.wfp.org/document_download/WFP-0000142941?_ga=2.65348718.1908622355.1697649160-1082179216.1697649160
Tagged: Southeast Asia, Democracy, Democratization, Politics, Political Structure, East Timor.
